Our client recently purchased the above property and planned to carry out major refurbishment throughout. During the Asbestos Refurbishment and Demolition Survey, we identified Asbestos Insulating Board (AIB) soffits on both sides of the property.

The client proceeded with the removal work and upgraded to UPVC soffits. The property is now completely asbestos-free.

Massive credit goes to the window fitters, who displayed a high level of caution and responsibility by immediately stopping work when they discovered suspicious material hidden behind modern UPVC soffits. Their quick decision to halt the job and not disturb the material further was crucial in preventing the potential release of harmful asbestos fibres. Asbestos is a hazardous material that, when disturbed, can release fine fibres into the air, posing serious health risks such as lung cancer, mesothelioma, and asbestosis. In this case, their vigilance helped to avoid a potentially dangerous situation.

Once the suspicious material was identified, a bulk sampling analysis was conducted to determine if it contained asbestos. The results came back positive for both Amosite (brown asbestos) and Chrysotile (white asbestos). These two types of asbestos were commonly used in construction materials due to their durability and heat-resistant properties. The material in question was confirmed to be Asbestos Insulation Board (AIB), a high-risk asbestos-containing material (ACM) that is known for its potential to release large quantities of asbestos fibres if disturbed.

Given the hazardous nature of the material, immediate action was required. We arranged for an independent analyst to carry out personal air monitoring during the emergency clean-up and encapsulation work. Personal air monitoring involved measuring the concentration of asbestos fibres in the air in real time, ensuring that workers are not being exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos. This was a critical safety measure, especially during asbestos removal or encapsulation, to ensure that workers were protected throughout the process.

In addition to the personal air monitoring, a reassurance air test was conducted once all the work was completed. This test checked the air quality in the area to confirm that asbestos fibres were no longer present, ensuring that the space was safe for re-entry and use. The combination of these tests provided a comprehensive safety check, guaranteeing that both workers and future occupants would not be at risk from asbestos exposure.

This careful process of detection, monitoring, and clean-up highlights the importance of professional asbestos management and the diligence of the window fitters in this scenario.

The boiler in question contained asbestos ropes as well as a short section of asbestos cement flue pipe, both of which are considered asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). Asbestos ropes were commonly used in older boilers due to their excellent heat resistance, while asbestos cement flue pipes were often installed to carry exhaust gases because of their durability and fire-resistant properties. However, both materials posed significant health risks when disturbed, as they can release asbestos fibres into the air. Inhalation of these fibres is known to cause serious health issues such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.

The removal of asbestos rope and cement flue pipe required careful planning and execution to minimise the risk of asbestos fibre release. In this particular case, the removal was carried out under locally controlled conditions, which meant that specific safety measures were put in place to contain any potential asbestos contamination within the immediate work area. This is different from fully controlled conditions, which are used for higher-risk asbestos materials, but locally controlled conditions are still stringent and adhere to strict health and safety protocols.

The process involved erecting a localised containment around the boiler to ensure that any asbestos fibres released during the removal process remained confined to the area. This containment area was then carefully monitored, and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including masks and protective suits, was worn by all workers involved in the removal process. Negative pressure units and air monitoring equipment were used to ensure that asbestos fibres did not escape into the surrounding environment.

The entire removal process, including the asbestos rope and the cement flue pipe, was completed in under one hour, demonstrating efficient execution by trained asbestos removal specialists. After removal, all waste materials were carefully sealed, labelled, and disposed of in accordance with local asbestos disposal regulations. This swift and controlled approach minimised the risk of asbestos exposure to workers and the public, ensuring the safe handling and removal of hazardous materials.

Asbestos soffits were typically made from Asbestos Insulation Board (AIB), which often contains two types of asbestos fibres: Chrysotile, also known as white asbestos, and Amosite, or brown asbestos. These materials were commonly used in construction due to their fire resistance, strength, and insulating properties. However, as we now know, asbestos fibres pose significant health risks when disturbed, as inhaling these fibres can lead to serious lung conditions such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer.

The process of asbestos soffit removal, particularly those made from AIB, required a specialised and cautious approach, as the methodology differs significantly from the removal of other types of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). AIB is classified as a higher-risk material because it can release large quantities of asbestos fibres if disturbed. The removal of AIB soffits was therefore not a simple task and could not be treated like other lower-risk materials, such as asbestos cement.

Due to the high risk involved, we carried out the removal of asbestos soffits made from AIB under Fully Controlled Conditions. This meant that every step of the process was carefully managed and monitored to prevent the release of dangerous asbestos fibres into the environment. The use of controlled conditions included measures such as the erection of enclosures, the use of negative pressure units to prevent airborne asbestos, and thorough decontamination procedures. Additionally, all workers involved in the removal process wore specialised personal protective equipment (PPE) to safeguard their health.

This meticulous approach ensured that the asbestos fibres were contained and did not pose a risk to both the workers and the general public. Asbestos removal was heavily regulated, and adhering to strict safety guidelines was essential to prevent any accidental exposure.